Brighton bards
February 22, 2010 by Olivia Wilson · Leave a Comment

Stray Signals
Brighton now boasts an array of Poetry and Spoken Word events on a regular basis. The Badger sent writer Helen Grace to check out the latest offerings
It has to be said that ‘E.G. Poetry’ is the straightest poetry reading I’ve been to for a while, in the sense they were literally reading the words off the page. But, don’t get me wrong, it was no less exciting for this. Although slam poetry in its improvised spontaneity is all the rage in some circles, the night proved that the written word still packs a punch.
The event showcased the work of four poets; Alex Brockhurst, Vidran Ravinthiran, Sonya Smith and Ken Champion from ‘tall-lighthouse’, one of the country’s leading poetry presses. And four strikingly different acts they were, but with one thing in common – a complete lack of pretentiousness. This couldn’t have been further exemplified by one of the highlights of the evening for me, Ken Champion’s poem ‘Anthropomorthingy’, poetry without pretense if ever I heard any. ‘E.G. Poetry’ didn’t pretend to be anything else but as the title suggests, examples of poetry. And it was brilliant.
Read more
“Are you allergic to me?!”
February 22, 2010 by Alana Marmion-Warr · Leave a Comment

Roger Allam and Jodhi May in the 2006 production of Blackbird at the Albery.
Questions are raised in SUDS’ new production
Last week I was invited to watch a twenty-minute snippet of SUDS’ (Sussex University Drama Society) week seven production of Blackbird, followed by a short interview with the cast and director of the play.
As I watched in the cold rehearsal room in Falmer House, I was already impressed by the level of commitment these students were giving – a good sign of quality. The extract I saw was very intense, but not exhausting (I wish I was able to see the whole thing!).
My first question after the performance, and perhaps the most obvious, was why this play? The director, Stefan Adegbola, informs me that he saw this play performed a few years ago and was instantly impressed. “It was my first experience at the theatre with a ‘taboo’ subject being treated so subtly. It wasn’t ironic, there was no jokes, and no happy ending. A fascinating play.”
Read more
Pappy’s Sketches
February 22, 2010 by Tom Orange · Leave a Comment

Pappy's
Pappy’s are hard to define. They effortlessly blend the surreal and the sublime with visual, musical and physical comedy. There is a striking moment when you first realise that there is no ‘edgy’ humour of that tired brand involving racism, paedophilia or crudeness. There is no swearing and there is no attempt to shock; the most shocking joke of the night was announced as ‘Anne Frank’s boyfriend,’ a perfectly constructed and simple piece in which ‘Karl’ was summoned downstairs, ‘not because they didn’t like him’ but because he just ‘had’ to leave. Queue appearance of ‘Karl’ trudging dejectedly through the attic door complete with One-Man-Band drum kit, cymbals et al.
Read more
Audience Theatrics
February 22, 2010 by Hannah Guinness · Leave a Comment

Theatre Audience
Embarrassing stories from the Stalls
During a performance of Breakfast at Tiffanys in November last year an audience member vomited over a balcony, showering six people below with sick and nearly distracting Anna Friel from the song that she was singing.
Most people have a story like that; ones which involve inappropriate behaviour and moments of acute embarrassment. In the case of the poor soul who threw up everywhere, perhaps they had suddenly fallen ill, or perhaps as with someone else I know, they had drunk too much; after a performance of Bernard Shaw’s St Joan at the National, she tipsily tripped, lost her footing and subsequently completed a spectacular descent (incorporating two roly polys and a mildly serious blow to the head), down a stair case. It’s always at the venues which seem synonymous with behaving in a mature and refined manner (at least that’s how it always seems to me when I go to the theatre) where you end up making a complete tit of yourself. Perhaps what signals your entrance into the real adult world (university doesn’t count) is when you can start behaving in a moderately normal manner in places such as the theatre.
Read more
West Side Story gets SMuTy
February 18, 2010 by James Duffield · Leave a Comment

The Cast of West Side Story
Gradual Decline
February 18, 2010 by Hannah Guinness · Leave a Comment
The Gradual Decline of a Previously Tight Family Unit in the Face of Economic Hardship: A Comedy didn’t cross the line of good taste so much as stamp, spit and do a widdle on it. There were gags about Downs Syndrome, limbless children, and an array of other sensitive subjects. That said, it proved to be entertaining; the gags were intelligently done and stayed on the right side of the border between exposing people’s prejudices and indulging in them.
Read more
Gradual Decline
January 27, 2010 by Hannah Guinness · Leave a Comment
The Badger talks to Sussex comedy group Casual Violence! about black comedy, kitchen-sink dramas and urination
Hannah: Okay so I’m here to talk to you about the Gradual decline of…
James: The Gradual decline of a previously tight family unit in the face of economic hardship: A comedy.
Hannah: I’ve read that it’s a spin on a ‘gritty kitchen sink drama’.
Adam: Yes, really strange irony, my old school is putting on a play at the same time called ‘Love on the Dole’ with exactly the same story, but it’s serious. Properly going for the heart strings stuff, whereas this is, going for the mole strings.
Hannah: Can you give a brief synopsis of what happens?
Adam: It’s based around a family living in Manchester or Newcastle.
James: an unspecified northern place.
Adam: You’ve got Barry, the big man of the house who loses his job, and the son Mark played by Alex here, whose got no arms or legs and lives in a box. Probably the most controversial part is the daughter whose parents are labouring under the misapprehension that she’s got Downs syndrome and are repressing her because of it. It’s showing each family member’s struggle, but presented in a ridiculous and comic way.
James: With the daughter, it’s looking at people’s attitudes to that sort of thing (Downs Syndrome).
Adam: A lot of the comedy that I do is looking at stupidity and ignorance. The two characters in this play who are disabled or considered disabled are actually the strongest in the play and by the end we are invited to have judgements about the mother and the father.
Hannah: Your comedy does push limits, it’s quite black but it does have a point.
Alex: It’s not ‘haha Down’s Syndrome’, it’s portraying attitudes towards it.
Adam: There isn’t a single joke made at the expense of disabled people.
Hannah: Obviously there’s a fine line, and you should consider how complicit the audience is.
James: Oh definitely, it’s all quite dark and grotesque but we don’t do offensive comedy.
Adam: But then there’s certain subjects that when people hear, they press the alarm button in their head and go ‘ah, that’s offensive’.
Hannah: There’s a delightful quote in an interview that you said about pissing on people’s boundaries.
James: (laughing) no, I said I don’t like to piss on people’s boundaries!
Adam: That’s a good point. We don’t like pissing on people, we do like pissing on their boundaries.
James: I said I don’t like pissing on people’s boundaries!
Alex: Pissing near people but not actually on them. Sometimes we splash them.
Hannah: Nothing actually on your clothes.
James: When I got interviewed for the first time by the badger about Porn for the Blind I said I didn’t want to step on people’s boundaries but we’re aware we might be toeing the line, the second for the monologues in October we said that we won’t completely piss on people’s boundaries and now we’ve said that we’ll piss everywhere and some people might get splashed.
Alex: Bring an umbrella.
James: There’s always people who like to hit the red button though.
Hannah: A little Daily Mail reader in the corner of the room.
Adam: It’s the kind of mentality that almost deliberately misses the point.
Adam: The comedy is dark but it takes a position of ignorance and makes it. look ridiculous. I actually once got attacked for mocking stupidity. I was doing stand-up and some guy got up and asked me to define stupidity. What a stupid question.
James: It kind of proves the point. You feel vindicated when people have that sort of reaction. Sometimes when I’ve done sketches that have been close to the bone, and people pick up on one aspect, you kind of mentally tick them off next to the idiot box. Comedy is the format where you can play with these sorts of things.
Hannah: It’s the space on stage where you can articulate certain issues safely.
Alex: And if you laugh at it, it takes away its power.
Adam: It’s got to be in a context where that’s obvious though.
Hannah: I was thinking about Harry Potter, when you get the scary things in the cupboard.
Adam: A boggart.
Hannah: And you’re supposed to laugh at them and they’ll go away.
Alex: We are the boggart.
James: Yeah laugh at us and we’ll go away.
Alex: We’ll hide in your cupboards.
James: With one play, Dead as a Dodo, this guy comes to sit next to me and was asking about the comedy group. There was a flyer for Dead as a Dodo on the table and I showed it to him and he told me that he was from the island where all the dodos were massacred by English and Portuguese soldiers and so found the title quite offensive. Apparently he hadn’t heard of the saying ‘dead as a dodo’ and later on I caught him downstairs ripping up posters and flyers. He said that he didn’t understand, why didn’t we call it ‘dead as a doughnut’? He compared the slaughter of the dodos to the Nazis killing the Jews in the Holocaust. The play was actually about the destructive impulses of mankind and how this resulted in the death of the dodo and as soon as I explained this he apologised.
Hannah: Do you have any comedy influences that you use?.
Adam: Christopher Morris from Brass Eye. I think TV comedy is dying. Brass Eye came out eight years ago and that was the last really solid comedy programme. Now you have to look to the internet. A lot of web animators don’t have the same constraints as they would in TV, and that’s where the future of comedy is.
‘The Gradual Decline of a Previously Tight Family Unit in the Face of Economic Hardship’
Marlborough Little Theatre, 29th/30th Jan, 8pm, £5
Dial ‘M’ For Murder
November 28, 2009 by Hannah Guinness · Leave a Comment
The story of a jealous and avaricious husband attempting to commit the perfect murder was retold in a subtle, moderately suspenseful production of the Hitchcockian classic, Dial ‘M’ for Murder. Although adequately managing to ratchet up the tension at points, the play over all proved to be distinctly underwhelming and formulaic, with little evidence of innovation or original interpretation.
It was a clever use of set design which conveyed much of the silent, slow sense of menace and forboding that the play did manage to achieve. The use of a swivelling stage, silently rotating as the action proceeded created a subtle sense of disorientation, whilst the deceptively simple use of a red veil like curtain, which would at times move around much as the stage did, added a sinister unease.
An unwelcomely discordant note was struck with the clumsily staged strangling scene; accompanied by melodramatic music, slightly amateurish ‘gagging’ sound effects, and a badly choreographed and unconvincing physical struggle between Sheila Wendice (Aislin McGuckin) and the would-be murderer Captain Lesgate (Daniel Hill), I disliked this departure from the effectively disconcerting stillness of the production; rather than making me jump it made me laugh a little at how silly it was.
The actors on the whole were competent , with distinguishing turns from Richard Lintern as Tony Wendice and Des McAleer as Inspector Hubbard. One of the more chilling moments of the play occurred when Wendice, after mistakenly thinking that he had evaded the detective’s suspicion , stood alone on the stage and hugged himself in delight, emitting the creepiest of giggles.
Despite some striking moments however, this revival of Dial ‘M’ for Murder seemed unoriginal and unexciting, more like an imitation of the cinematic version than anything else.
Psychic Sally
November 28, 2009 by Olivia Wilson · Leave a Comment
An Audience with Sally Morgan, from start to finish, was not as we had expected. Too accurate at points to be completely dismissed but too inaccurate at others to be entirely believed, it was nevertheless both compelling and uncomfortable throughout.
Arriving with a combination of scepticism and curiosity, the former was heightened by the slick video montage that greeted the audience at the beginning of the show. Featuring celebrities emphatically pronouncing their faith in Morgan as a psychic, and footage of some of Morgan’s more dramatic spiritual encounters added a sense of initial cynicism to the proceedings, suggesting as it did a commercially minded production eager to capitalize upon the fame of Morgan’s more recognizable clients and the more sensationalist of her readings.
We were surprised then to find Morgan to be personable, sympathetic and unpretentious. Indeed, the content and format of the show largely contradicted the way in which it was marketed. Billed as an ‘ an entertaining…theatrical spectacle’ on the flyer, (which also included a message of thanks from Princess Diana) what unfolded in the Hawth’s theatre was hardly what one might call entertainment, unless it was of the voyeuristic and macabre sort.
An Audience with Sally Morgan consisted primarily of Morgan sensing spiritual ‘visitors’, usually deceased relatives of members of the audience, who would relay via the medium messages and greetings to their loved ones still living on the ‘earthly plane’. In this respect it is hard to see the harm in a medium. If a few members of the audience go away feeling comforted and reassured, there can be little wrong in that. Like a sympathetic aunt, Morgan offered solace for audience participants, many of whom were clearly still grieving the loss of a loved one
What complicated the situation was the fact that highly private moments of frequently intense grief were played out as public spectacle. As mere bystanders one felt more intrusive than anything else. One must also consider the vulnerability of those in the audience, who appeared to have come with the anticipation of communicating with deceased family members and friends. The reality of the impressionability of those with a deep rooted emotional investment in the show is a disconcerting one.
Hannah Guinness and Olivia Wilson
Everything must go: papas, puppets and pathos
November 27, 2009 by Cai Draper · Leave a Comment

Everything Must Go
One of the performance editors told me she had a puppet show to review: ‘Of course!’ I said. ‘That sounds like a larf’. But, happily, the ‘puppet show’ formed only a fifth of this stunning performance from award-winning performer Kristin Fredricksson. A live art extravaganza comprising narration, film, cardboard cut-outs, wild movement and delicate puppetry, this was a one-woman-wonder portrayal of the creator’s father, Karl a man who – quite literally – showed his bloomers to orthodoxy. The necessarily unconventional performance took us on a family saga, from tricky beginnings in Wales, through the shockingly sudden death of Karl’s wife and the consequent genesis of his cross-dressing, to the solicitous ingenuity that her father developed later on in life.
Kristin first performed the show with her father, and the pair danced offstage together in the final scene. Sadly, however, Karl died in June this year (at the ripe old age of 78), and that scene was replaced with video footage of the original performance.
Kristin had already created a remarkable living memorial of her father and his story, but it now takes on a new poignancy. Why brood quietly in your bedroom and sigh at the passing of a person the world should have known, but didn’t? Show the world that person! And he was quite a man: hurdler, P.E. teacher (who covertly taught his pupils ballet), cross-dresser, player of characters, obsessive hoarder. He undoubtedly bordered on fruit-cake status, with snippets of film showing us his penchant for milk-crate collection and nipple exposure; one felt at times that his constant masquerading was almost an obstruction to his love for his daughters.
The piece having been conceived and performed before Karl’s death, the newer audiences’ perceptions of meaning within the play are inevitably transformed. Whilst Kristin’s intentions may have remained the same, her father’s passing has invested the work with an increased sense of loss and longing. This new element of mourning seemed to draw out the intensity of the love felt between father and daughter, with a gut-wrenching rawness that left the audience weeping. It is said that all people grieve in their own way and I’m sure that’s true, but Kristin really showed us a unique approach: on stage, unaided, in an hour of inspired, magic theatricality.
‘Everything Must Go’ was staged at The Basement, 24 Kensington Street. For other similarly original productions, see their December listings at
thebasement.uk.com


>
>